Perspectivas histórica e crítica da responsabilidade de juízes
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
2019-06-04
Autores
Franco, João Vitor Sias
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
Resumo
The dissertation has as object of investigation the judge's accountability, legal Institute which aims to oversee the judicial activity and apply sanctions to magistrates who fail to comply with their duties. It was considered that this Institute serves as a tool of legitimacy of the judiciary when allows the magistrate to account their decisions to society. The issue of this research consisted in the discussion of the accountability models focused on the control regime of the judges activities in Brazil, especially considering the paradigms of accountability and independence of Magistracy. Throughout the essay, three ideal (or pure) models of judge's accountability were identified – the perfect judge, typical of medieval natural law; the legalistic centralism, characteristic of the modern and dynastic monarchies and, finally, the legal-positivist, dominant in liberal States. The three paradigms served as guide for an evaluation of accountability models in Brazil, in order to allow the identification of historical variations of those models, and, in the end, purpose changes in accountability regime. The overall objective of the dissertation was to contribute to the reflection on the matter, especially on the wear of the current model and the growing requirement of judicial activism. The study developed by means of historical-legal-dogmatic perspective. Undertook the survey of legislative, jurisprudential and journalistic sources was carried out for the proposed research.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Accountability , Judiciary , Judges , Judicial organization , History of brazilian law , Poder Judiciário - Responsabilidade , Magistrados , Organização judicial , História do direito brasileiro
Citação
FRANCO, João Vitor Sias. Perspectivas histórica e crítica da responsabilidade de juízes. 2019. 147 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito Processual) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito Processual, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Centro de Ciências Jurídicas e Econômicas, Vitoria, 2019.