Filosofia

URI Permanente desta comunidade

http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/17515
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia

Centro: CCHN
Telefone: (27) 4009 7623
URL do programa: http://www.filosofia.ufes.br/pt-br/pos-graduacao/PPGFil

Navegar

Navegando Filosofia por Autor "Albuquerque, Ivanhoé Leal"

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    A alienação da liberdade pela própria liberdade : o paradoxo do problema do mal em Paul Ricoeur
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2017-07-10) Silva, Janaína Rosa da; Barreira, Marcelo Martins; Paula, Adna Candido de; Botter, Barbara; Albuquerque, Ivanhoé Leal; Souza, Thana Mara de
    This research aims to investigate the paradox of the problem of evil that alienates freedom through freedom itself. Since Augustine, philosophy has rejected the idea of a nature of evil as a being, as a thing, which, on the one hand, led the understanding of evil to the field of the imperfection of human nature. Modern philosophy places freedom as the central point of discussions around the origin of evil action, especially Descartes, Kant and Hegel. However, imputability and guilt show the limit of the autonomy of the sovereign subject, since the subject is both capable of good and capable of evil. In order to understand the paradox between evil, freedom and the able subject of Ricoeurian, this investigation begins with Ricoeur's Philosophy of Will, in an attempt to show how the capable subject is placed in opposition to the sovereign subject from the realization of the fragility of the will in the face of evil. Then, from the long hermeneutic way as a form of interpretation we seek to understand the meaning of hermeneutical theory of symbols and myths, transmitted by the ancient Babylonian, Jewish and Christian cultures in the works symbolic of evil (1960) and The conflict of interpretations (1969). The relation between evil and freedom in Ricoeur has its genesis in direct dialogue with the problem of radical evil and the free will of Kantian philosophy. In the face of the subject of Ricoeurian who wants to reveal himself as a being that brings to light through the mysterious subjectivity constituted between body and thought a subject of powers. This capable subject is criticized by Levinas with the theory of absolute alterity, which is opposed to the Ricoeurian subjectivity of self-understanding. In the course of our investigation, we note that the subject of powers of Ricoeur, although clothed with a paradox, has the merit of empowering the human being as agent, an agent responsible for his actions. The study of the performative character of freedom without the use of transcendence led us to think of the ransom of forgiveness as a form of restoration of alienated freedom.
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    A influência da mímese na hermenêutica simbólica de Paul Ricoeur
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2015-02-27) Belo, Eliezer; Barreira, Marcelo Martins; Cavalieri, Edebrande; Albuquerque, Ivanhoé Leal
    This work performs an approach about hermeneutics symbol in Paul Ricoeur from the perspective of mimesis. To understand the importance of mimesis in hermeneutics of Ricoeur was mythologically it was decided to develop the study to present the stages of development of thought. The first study was based on the knowledge of the philosophy of the will. This first part intended to show Ricoeur entry in the symbol field. In the following reflections and evolution of thought. Another part complements this first study and tried to assess the graft hermeneutic phenomenology. The proposition of this second part was to justify the existence of a symbol of hermeneutics, considering the symbol as a possible starting point for resolving the conflict of interpretations. Another study complemented this work is developed in three stages. First concentrated in the field of hermeneutics from developing a myth and symbol description, with the intention of presenting the range of dimensions of the symbols. Then was taken into account the evolution of speech to reach the write state. In that same set, the myth and the symbol are analyzed from the aspect of semantic mediation that is between them. Subsequent to this second part held a reflection on the time in Augustine and Aristotle, considering the dimensions of the experience of time. The study which end the study was conducted in three stages. The first and the second are devoted to the relationship between mimesis and muthos, and mediation between mimesis I and III by mimesis II. The second focused on the reader, and the figure of the world’s mimesis consolidation and setting, via reflection on the reference. The closure was left with the task of carrying out an assessment of the symbol of hermeneutics, considering aspects of mimesis, the action imitated in the narration, the time of the work and the reader's worlds and work as configuration elements.