Psicologia Institucional

URI Permanente desta comunidade

http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/17537
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia Institucional

Centro: CCHN
Telefone: (27) 3357-9500
URL do programa: http://www.psicologiainstitucional.ufes.br/pt-br/pos-graduacao/PPGPSI

Navegar

Navegando Psicologia Institucional por Autor "Aguiar, Yara Nascimento de"

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    A atuação de psicólogos/as no cultivo de espaços coletivos no judiciário : uma conversa com eira e à beira com pais e mães em disputa de guarda
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2020-11-19) Aguiar, Yara Nascimento de; César, Janaína Mariano ; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6532-1380; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6837127144059829; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9847964356428900; Siqueira, Luziane de Assis Ruela; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7510-9148; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6917111497820903; Vicentin, Maria Cristina Gonçalves; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1718-6721; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6947268789571591
    Forensic activity plays a central role in the activities performed by psychologists in the Judiciary. The foundation that guides these practices is related to legal forms arising from the procedural game, the production of evidence and the notions of truth and conflict forged in this field. Entering the doors of the Forum with the knowledge of Psychology continues to be a challenge in the encounter with the ways of operating in Law, since, at different times, they challenge actions for the judicialization of life, the conduct regime, judgment, criminalization and punishment. This dissertation work, problematizing this performance, points out ways for families in situations of marital separation, divorce and / or custody dispute, corroborating that fathers and mothers are protagonists of their life processes and build solidarity networks that allow greater autonomy, not necessarily needing to transfer to the legal instance the decision about the dispute they are experiencing. To build activities different from the forensics, the research built as a possibility of intervention: the creation of collective spaces in the Judiciary, through the experience of group devices, such as parenting workshops and conversation circles. The conversation emerges as a research-work methodology through meetings with fathers and mothers who are in judicial custody proceedings at the Family Court, so that the creation of a communicational and dialogical network is the entrance and exit door for demands that they were permeated only by individualizing actions correlated to psychological assessments. We record the meetings in a field diary, from which we produce narratives, analytical material of the work. Through a heterogeneous and plural group, through laterality and co-gestive movements, there was a sharing of experiences and the analysis of relevant issues for the participants, also expanding collective and social demands. Thus, we understand that the research enabled an ethical, aesthetic and political exercise to work with Psychology in the Judiciary