Mestrado em Filosofia
URI Permanente para esta coleção
Nível: Mestrado Acadêmico
Ano de início: 2008
Conceito atual na CAPES: 4
Ato normativo: Homologado pelo CNE (Portaria MEC Nº 609, de 14/03/2019). Publicação no DOU 18 de março de 2019, seç. 1 - Parecer CNE/CES nº 487/2018, Processo no 23001.000335/2018-51). Publicado no DOU 28/07/2005, seção 1, página 11)
Periodicidade de seleção: Semestral
Área(s) de concentração: Filosofia
Url do curso: https://filosofia.ufes.br/pt-br/pos-graduacao/PPGFil/detalhes-do-curso?id=47
Navegar
Navegando Mestrado em Filosofia por Autor "Araújo, Ricardo Correa de"
Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3
Resultados por página
Opções de Ordenação
- ItemA legitimidade pós-metafísica dos direitos humanos em Jürgen Habermas(Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2018-07-19) Lourete, Suzana de Alvarenga; Luchi, José Pedro; Dutra, Delamar José Volpato; Araújo, Ricardo Correa deThis work analyses Human Rights within Jürgen Habermas' political philosophy, from a postmethaphysical arguition of Moral and Law, as well as their legitimacy in democratic, multicultural and plural societies, as a way of social integration. The first chapter explores Habermas' understanding of the methaphysical thinking as well as his critics to this paradigm, often centered in the Kantianism, to the norms in contemporary democratic societies. Thus, it is analysed how the Frankfurt philosopher engenders his theory of rationality, initially with elements of his Theory of Communicative Action and, in sequence, with the introduction of procedure ruler principles of his Discursive Theory, to know, Principle of Universalization (‘U’) and Principle of Discourse (‘D’). This explanation leads to the conclusion how the postmethaphysical ethics will ground moral and legal norms. The second chapter analyses the habermasian approach to the nexus between the postconventional moral and the discourse ethics, leading to understand the relation between this Moral and the Law. The Principle of Discourse assumes, by the juridical institutionalization, the figure of the Principle of Democracy, which ensures legitimador power to the procedural legalization. The Principle of Democracy results, according to Habermas, by the interaction of the Principle of Discourse and the legal form, which is constituted by the subjective liberty of action and by the coercive force, stabilizing the social expectations of acting. The chapter finishes with Apel's criticism to the moral neutrality of the Principle of Discourse thesis and Habermas' replics advocating his theory of a complementary relation between moral and law. The third chapter explains the role of Human Rights in the habemasian practical and legal philosophy. The first part shows how Habermas understands the internal nexus between Human Rights and people’s sovereignty, which, by the opposite of de liberal and republican traditions, must not be polarized, because they are premises to a reciprocal cooriginal existence. From this cooriginality begins, or the “logical genesis”, a range of fundamental rights to the democratic States’ constitutions. Finally, this work sustains the role of mediator of human dignity as the postmethaphysical universal moral source of Human Rights, before the primacy of the justice over the good.
- ItemNeopragmatismo e religião : uma abordagem da religião como política cultural em Richard Rorty(Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2017-04-18) Donadia, André Oliva; Barreira, Marcelo Martins; Araújo, Ricardo Correa de; Vieira, Susana de Castro AmaralThis research aims to examine the central elements of liberalism"s political philosophy and a description of what Rorty understands as justification to the defense of liberal institutions. We are going to analyze Rorty"s antifoundadionalism strategy to defend the contemporary liberal institutions. After that, we will examine Rorty"s liberal utopia. In this context, Richard Rorty argues that the religious speech is at odds with his liberal ideals. As a result, he argues, in a first moment, that religion must be privatized so that the State remains neutral. After exploring the views that constitute his choices, this dissertation shows, in particular, three of Rorty"s positions that he argues in his writings. The first argument is that religion should be privatized, the second consists in the defense of marginalization of ecclesiastics institutions and the third is that defending pragmatism is, as a result, to defend a secular liberal utopia. In this work, it will be explained how these arguments are entailed to Rorty"s commitment to his neo-pragmatism and how they fit inside this logic. We will start with a description, then it will be demonstrated that these arguments are at odds with some of “philosophical” assumptions that Rorty has made, which create practical problems that might eliminate the social ideal that Rorty designed, which creates practical problems for the social and political ideal that Rorty advocates, and finally we address a review of Rorty's position on the subject and indicate a possible inclusion of religion in public space through the notion of "literary culture."
- ItemO preço do Pluralismo : sobre a função moduladora do princípio da diferença no liberalismo político de Rawls(Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2016-07-18) Pessin, Wands Salvador; Araújo, Ricardo Correa de; Luchi, José Pedro; Araújo, Luiz Bernardo Leite; Barreira, Marcelo MartinsThe research analyzes the contribution of John Rawls in the current debate about public justice. Starting from the basic conceptions of rawlsian justice theory, highlighting the formulation of the principles of justice, also the notion of effectiveness in the acess to fair equality and in the exercise of fundamental freedoms will be checked out, analyzing this notion in the light of the primary social goods idea and taking into account the influence of the private comprehensive moral doctrines. It is intended to show that the solution to the problems encountered here, the solution which will be extracted from the suggestions in the rawlsian work, it undergoes a kind of modulation on the principle of difference. The goal is to demonstrate that this can foster a more egalitarian liberal democracy, which justifies the renewed relevance of the research on the legacy of Rawls.