Doutorado em História
URI Permanente para esta coleção
Nível: Doutorado
Ano de início: 2011
Conceito atual na CAPES: 5
Ato normativo: Homologado pelo CNE (Portaria MEC Nº 1585 de 20/06/2003).
Publicado no DOU em 23/05/203.
Parecer CNE/CES 083/2003.
Periodicidade de seleção: Anual
Área(s) de concentração: História Social das Relações Políticas
Url do curso: https://historia.ufes.br/pt-br/pos-graduacao/PPGHIS/detalhes-do-curso?id=1413
Navegar
Navegando Doutorado em História por Assunto "América Latina"
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Resultados por página
Opções de Ordenação
- ItemMulticulturalismo, lucha por la tierra y violencia: la Organización Nacional Indígena de Colombia (1975-1998)(Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2019-06-13) Diaz Uribe, Mauricio Alejandro; Gil, Antonio Carlos Amador; Apolinário, Juciene Ricarte; Silva, Sandro; Dadalto, Maria Cristina; Fagundes, Pedro ErnestoThe aim of this thesis is to analyze the transformations and tensions in the forms, discourses, claims and demands of the modern Colombian indigenous movement (MIC) through its most representative organization at the national level: The National Indigenous Organization of Colombia (ONIC) since its appearance the 80s to the year 1998. After recognition of Colombia as a social state of ethnic and cultural plural right in the 90s, many of the MIC's discourses and concepts were transformed; for some researchers, this is due to the stagnation of the leaderships and forms of representation of the organizations that have become political parties. For others, rather than a setback, it is due to the emergence of new discourses on autonomy, territoriality, ethnic affirmation; and a permanent tension between the state, the ethnic identity and the multiculturalism. In the case of Colombia, this tension manifests itself in a social context of permanent conflict of generalized violence. The territories of indigenous communities must coexist with war between armed, legal and illegal actors, and the threatening presence of multinational corporations interested in environmental goods and mineral resources. Faced with this situation, indigenous leaders, especially the ONIC, try to cope by maintaining their cultural practices based on their worldviews, their own development plans, maintaining the unity in the diversity of interethnic relations. In this way, the research problematize this tension from three aspects: The concept of territory, the practice of the multiculturalism and the scenario of violence, as themes that project the discourse and actions of its leaders, in the last decades facing the dilemmas of the multicultural State.
- ItemMulticulturalismo, Lucha por la Tierra y Violencia: la Organización Nacional Indígena de Colombia (1975-1998)(Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2019-06-13) Uribe, Mauricio Alejandro Diaz; Gil, Antonio Carlos Amador; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5464-5889; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2222929508102037; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2447-3721; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9240703691509560; Fagundes, Pedro Ernesto; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1419-1130; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4463264638076544; Silva, Sandro Jose da; https://orcid.org/0000000241249430; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9873497099288005; Dadalto, Maria Cristina; https://orcid.org/0000000279253929; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1720560349495010; Apolinario, Juciene RicarteThe objective of the thesis is to analyze the changes and tensions in the forms, speeches, demands and claims of the modern Colombian Indigenous Movement (MIC), through the analysis of the official documents of its most representative national organization: National Indigenous Organization of Colombia (ONIC). Besides, it focuses on the analytical review of various texts and speeches by the most recognized indigenous leaders of the movement. Since the emergence in the mid-1970s, and after the recognition of Colombia as a multiethnic and multicultural social state of law in the 1990s, the MIC was configured as a historical process around representations and imaginaries in relation to the "indigenous problem". The research problematizes and discusses historical struggles and claims, as well as the trajectories and narratives of indigenous organizations and their representatives. From the historical context that constitutes modernity-colonialism, the emergence and re-signification of the discourses on autonomy, territoriality and ethnic affirmation, it is in permanent tension between the modern state, ethnic identity and neoliberal multiculturalism. In the Colombian case, this tension is manifested in a social context of conflict and widespread violence. The territories of indigenous communities coexist with war between armed actors and the threatening presence of multinational companies interested in environmental goods and mineral resources. In this situation, the indigenous leaders, especially the ONIC, try to reconfigure their cultural practices based on their worldviews and their own development plans. Thus, they seek to maintain political unity in the cultural diversity, in the complex network actors and interethnic relations, adapting or disputing their incorporation into the dilemmas of the multicultural nation-state of the late twentieth century.