Doutorado em Letras

URI Permanente para esta coleção

http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/17525

Nível: Doutorado
Ano de início: 2010
Conceito atual na CAPES: 5
Ato normativo: Homologado pelo CNE (Portaria MEC Nº 609, de 14/03/2019).
Publicação no DOU 18 de março de 2019, seç. 1, p.136 - Parecer CNE/CES nº 487/2018, Processo no 23001.000335/2018-51)
Periodicidade de seleção: Semestral
Área(s) de concentração: ESTUDOS LITERÁRIOS
Url do curso: https://letras.ufes.br/pt-br/pos-graduacao/PPGL/detalhes-do-curso?id=1503

Navegar

Navegando Doutorado em Letras por Assunto "Aesthetics of reception"

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Estética da recepção histórica da civilização burguesa: do liberalismo ao neoliberalismo
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2019-06-28) Barbosa, Diana Carla de Souza; Amaral, Sergio da Fonseca; https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8382-733X; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9383077540938356; https://orcid.org/; ttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2635586598007996; Zaidan, Junia Claudia Santana de Mattos; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7242947260879171; Feitosa, Fabiana Curto; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2590908538322927; Silva, Arlene Batista da; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8153-5776; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2371977118070548; Oliveira, Maria Fernanda Alvito Pereira de Souza; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2046-7065; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3599091868323141
    The present thesis aims to analyze three historical-aesthetic periods of bourgeois civilization from a critical approach of the work singular modernity: essay on the ontology of the present (2005), of the literary theorist Fredric Jameson. Are they: 1. Classic or heroic modernism; 2. European Late Modernism or European Ideology of Classical Modernism; 3. American modernity or American ideology of classical modernism. The first period is called heroic or classic because it was constituted as a phase of intense class struggle within Europe, with a global impact. No social segment was left out of this struggle for the course of history: neither the aristocracy, nor the clergy, nor the bourgeoisie nor the working class. Given this scenario, this thesis is hypothesized the argument that the period of bourgeois civilization of classical modernism would have been decisive for thought, culture, praxis - for art, literature - because all these manifestations of the human spirit also incorporated (in their specificities), at the time, the challenge of disputing history. Classical modernism as a historical setting in which history itself was in dispute, as the first period of bourgeois civilization, would have been the object of aesthetic and historical reception of later historical periods, namely: the period of late European modernity and the period of modernity American. European late modernity, as a historical and aesthetic period of reception of heroic modernism, was epicenter of the era of World War I and II. On the other hand, American modernity was and is a historical and aesthetic phase of reception of heroic modernism that emerged from World War II. Using a multidisciplinary theoretical contribution this thesis investigates the two historical and aesthetic periods of reception of heroic modernism quoted in order to analyze the system of censorship of class struggles that disputed history within the first phase of bourgeois civilization. At the same time, the aim of this thesis to investigate, also, the appearance of the reception aesthetics, especially considering the main theorists of the School of Constance, Germany, in the 60's of the last century. Although in different ways the hypothesis developed here is that theoreticians such as Hans Robert Jauss, Wolfgang Iser, and Karlheinz Stierle would have been influenced by the two quoted reception periods of heroic modernism, and this influence would have been and has been striking in the ideological structuring of aesthetics reception. From that point on, the objective was focused on the analysis of the ideological system of censorship, present in the Aesthetics of Reception, from its relation with the late European modernity (liberal ideology) and American modernity (neoliberal ideology)