Doutorado em Política Social
URI Permanente para esta coleção
Nível: Doutorado
Ano de início: 2012
Conceito atual na CAPES: 5
Ato normativo:
Homologado pelo CNE, Parecer CES/CNE nº 487/2018 (Portaria MEC 609, de 14/03/2019), DOU 18/03/2019, seção 1, p. 63.
Periodicidade de seleção: Anual
Área(s) de concentração: POLÍTICA SOCIAL, ESTADO E SOCIEDADE
Url do curso: https://politicasocial.ufes.br/pt-br/pos-graduacao/PPGPS/detalhes-do-curso?id=1421
Navegar
Navegando Doutorado em Política Social por Autor "Garcia, Maria Lúcia Teixeira"
Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3
Resultados por página
Opções de Ordenação
- ItemA intersetorialidade como estratégia técnica e política da Organização Mundial da Saúde e do Banco Mundial(Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2017-11-27) Abreu, Cassiane Cominoti; Garcia, Maria Lúcia Teixeira; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9851.8411; Mendonça, Luiz Vasconcellos Pessoa de; Couto, Berenice Rojas; Mendes, Jussara Maria Rosa; Vieira, Ana Cristina de SouzaThe objective of this thesis is to analyze the fundamentals of intersectoriality as a management strategy proposed by the World Health Organization and the World Bank, characterizing the intentionalities contained in the technical and political dimensions. To reach the goal, we conducted a qualitative research, involving documentary research from intersectoral and multisectoral keywords, from the texts available on the websites of these international agencies. The search occurred between 2015 and 2016. The method chosen as epistemological reference was the dialectical historical materialism. For data analysis we used the content analysis of the thematic type. The meaning of intersectionality for the World Health Organization and the World Bank is related to: performing actions, activities or joint efforts between various sectors; to a health strategy adopted at international health promotion conferences; as a synonym for multisectoral action among sectors and the joint work among professionals from different disciplines/professions to share knowledge or as a form of intervention, approach, actions, coordination between different sectors. The objectives for the use of intersectoriality/multi-sectorality by both Agencies are related to the resolution of social problems such as lack of health, education, epidemics and poor management of social policies. The promotion of intersectoral actions is related to the scope of social policies, especially for the poor and vulnerable, as a technical management tool capable of defragmenting social policies and solving social problems. Using the categories historicity, essence/appearance, the impossibility of solving social problems in capitalism and the defragmentation of social policies through the use of intersectorality was revealed. It is understood that the genesis of the fragmentation and social problems indicated by the Agencies are associated with the material basis that produce them: the social relations of production. These command the whole process and the human needs of social beings are not the priority of the system. We conclude that the apparent technical rationalization conferred to the intersectoriality/multisectorality by the international agencies World Health Organization and the World Bank masks ideological and political determinations in favor of the reproduction of social reform proposals allied to neoliberalism. These suppose that with good administration and resource management and intersectoriality it is possible to resolve expressions of the social Issue. The intersectoriality, in the conceptual aspect, must be understood as a technical and political action of articulation between sectors aiming at the construction, reaffirmation or opposition to collective projects.
- ItemAs universidades brasileiras e a indução estratégica da pesquisa : o comprometimento da autonomia científica(Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2016-09-21) Ribeiro, Daniella Borges; Ferraz, Ana Targina Rodrigues; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9264-7618; Mari, Cézar Luiz De; Mendes, Jussara Maria Rosa; Garcia, Maria Lúcia Teixeira; Nakatani, PauloThis study aims at analyzing the way the directions given to scientific research in Brazil through CNPq (Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) incentives has affected the production of knowledge in universities, as well as verifying whether or not scientific autonomy is compromised. This is a documental study carried out based on data about investigations funded by CNPq between 2011 and 2014. In this period, 135 calls for investigations were spread by this body, for which 93,367 proposals were submitted and 24,450 were approved for funding (26.2%). Of the 135 calls for research investigated, 105 (77.8%) required PhD degree for research submission; 128 (94.8%) were open to private institutions (for or nonprofit), and only 05 calls (3.7%) were specific for public institutions. Of the 24,450 research projects accepted for funding, 10,724 (43.9%) were submitted by institutions located in the Brazilian Southeast and 5,670 (23.2%) in the South Region, among which USP, UFRJ, UFMG, UFRGS and UNESP were the universities with most proposals approved. The wide area of knowledge that had the largest number of projects accepted was the agrarian sciences, with de 3,895 (15.9%) projects approved. Of the 135 calls for research investigated, in 126 (93.3%) the theme to be studied was provided. We understand thatinstitutional differentiation; diversification of funding sources for production of knowledge (promoting the idea that universities have autonomy to gather resources in the market); regional asymmetry and influence by the State concerning areas and themes to be studied compromise scientific autonomy in our country. The production of knowledge that could optimally meet the needs of Brazilian workers is subject to the needs of production and of the market attuned to the expectations of international bourgeoisie, which corroborates our position as peripheral country, dependent on global economy.
- ItemMovimento antiproibicionista no Brasil : discursos de resistência(Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2017-03-24) Leal, Fabíola Xavier; Garcia, Maria Lúcia Teixeira; Ferraz, Ana Targina Rodrigues; Rodrigues, Luciana Boiteux de Figueiredo; Carvalho, Thiago Fabres de; Lima, Rita de Cássia CavalcanteThis study aims at analyzing the resistance discourses present in debates about the Drug Policy in Brazil in order to unveil the meaning they convey in the present time and to which interests they bonded under the Gramscian categories. As specific objectives: analyze the drug policy based on the process of constructing and legitimizing the anti-prohibitionist; understand how the anti-prohibitionist movement is conformed in the processes of dispute, showing whether there is prevalence of supremacy methods or forms of hegemony; analyze the processes employed by civil society so as to identify in which historical moment the anti-prohibitionist movement is placed; list the main groups linked to the anti-prohibitionist struggle, identifying the main fight flags in their discourses; point out whether or not there is agreement in these discourses so that they are qualified in the anti-prohibitionist field; analyze the agenda for drug legalization from the anti-prohibitionist perspective; contribute to academia and society interested in the theme as critical reflection about the antiprohibitionist movement and the movement deriving from it. As theoreticalmethodological approach, we employed the critical dialectical materialist method based on the Gramscian theoretical framework. The data were obtained from a semi-structured interview with 7 individuals who were active in the resistance movement in the anti-prohibitionist field. The analysis was based on the concept in which a discourse is always related to its conditions of social-historical production where one can see the set of possible discourses. As a conclusion, we point out that the anti-prohibitionist movement Brazil has been managed by movements that stand in the field of resistance against the drug policy in force all over the world. Among the fight flags, the legalization and regulation of drugs from the anti-prohibitionist perspective are brought by the subjects from different perspectives. In this regard, we need to demystify the concepts and meanings of legalization presented. The anti-prohibitionist movement in Brazil is configured as resistance against the prohibition model in force. We can also highlight a few suggestions of strategies só that the movement can be presented from the perspective of change in reality, guided by the philosophy of praxis.